northern routes. And in real time, it’s training its AI models on US military movements via satellite. Trump is simply

revealing all the roots and protocols of US military operations to China like a free TV series. Let’s take a broader

look at what’s happening. Why is this a wonderful gift to Beijing? We’ll break down the top five lessons China has

already learned from this war, why US modern military doctrines are officially dead, and how this Middle Eastern

conflict is about to trigger a global inflation shock. The number of tankers stuck in the Strait of Hormuz is estimated at 984,

representing approximately 22% of the global tanker fleet. Supply contracts are being signed between three and six

months in advance, meaning the real consequences have not yet even begun. Now, zoom out. What exactly is the plan?

I’ve spent over a decade analyzing conflicts, energy markets, and the slow motion chess games that great powers

play with each other’s economies. And I’m telling you, what I’m seeing unfold right now is not strategy. It’s

improvisation dressed up in press conferences. It is a double down on insanity.

If you think about it, Iran, which for decades was the most sanctioned country in the world against which the US is now

using force, once the most powerful army in the world, and Iran has not fallen.

There is no regime change. Iran has raised prices all over the world. Iran is at a standstill. Was this the plan?

Here’s what makes it worse. The Pentagon knew. For three decades, under Bush,

Obama, Biden, the military establishment vigorously fought back against Israeli

pressure to go to war with Iran. In 2024 alone, the Israelis tried twice to trap

Biden into a direct confrontation. Once in April, again in October. Biden refused both times. General Kaine, the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs,

reportedly warned President Trump before February 28th that the United States did not have a viable military option. Trump

ignored him. Netanyahu told the president what he wanted to hear. The regime is fragile. One hard blow and it

crumbles, just like Venezuela. and Trump, not exactly surrounded by wise advisers, as one analyst put it, took the bait. China isn’t afraid.

There is a narrative circulating in Washington think tanks, on cable news,

and across social media since the first bombs fell. It goes like this. The United States takes out Venezuela’s oil

exports to China. Punch one. Then it takes out Iran. Punch two. China’s

economy collapses. America wins. Game over. It’s a neat story. It fits on a bumper sticker. And it is dangerously,

catastrophically wrong. Let me give you the numbers because numbers don’t care about narratives. China has achieved an energy self-sufficiency rate of 84%.

That means for every unit of energy China consumes only 16% comes from

abroad. And that number has been climbing for two decades. Not by accident but by design.

Massive investment in solar, wind,

hydroelect electric, dams, nuclear power, and the largest electric vehicle fleet on the planet. China’s electricity

production dwarfs that of the United States where the grid has been essentially stagnant for 30 years. This

is a 20year project. They set out in the year 2000 to dominate electric vehicles.

They began scaling renewable energy before most Western governments had even written a policy paper. And now their

renewable energy production matches their coal output. Within that remaining 16% of imported energy, oil makes up about 59%.

Of China’s total oil imports, roughly 17% comes from Iran, averaging between

1.38 and 1.61 million barrels per day across 2024 and 2025.

Run those numbers through and you arrive at a figure that should make every architect of this war lose sleep. China

depends on Iranian energy for approximately 1.5% of its total energy consumption. 1.5%.

That’s what we launched a war over. But here’s what the strategists in Washington either don’t know or refuse

to acknowledge. China doesn’t just import oil through conventional channels. Beijing has constructed a

shadow fleet of tankers representing roughly 18% of total global tanker

capacity operating entirely outside standard regulatory frameworks. These

vessels reflag midvoyage, rename themselves, disable their AIS transponders, and conduct shipto- ship

transfers in obscured waters off Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam to

rebrand Iranian crude as Malaysian or Omani before it enters Chinese customs

data. Since 2022, Chinese customs has reported zero direct oil imports from

Iran. Analytical firms tracking tanker movements confirm over 1.38 million

barrels per day still flowing. Current intelligence estimates suggest up to 300

million barrels of unsold oil sitting on shadow tankers right now, a floating strategic petroleum reserve. Combined

with onshore reserves estimated at 100 to 115 days of net import cover, Beijing

has built a buffer that can absorb months of disruption. Now, here’s where the strategy turns from merely wrong into actively self-destructive.

Look at who actually depends on the Strait of Hormuz. Japan gets 91% of its oil through that waterway. The Philippines 94%

20 million barrels flow through Hormuz daily and 80% of that volume is destined

for Asian markets. China also sources 31% of its liqufied natural gas from the

Middle East, Qatar, Oman, the UAE. So yes, China has real exposure, but compared to Japan, South Korea, the

Philippines, America’s own Indo-Pacific allies, that exposure is manageable.

Professor John Mirshimer at the University of Chicago put it precisely.

It’s Japan and South Korea that are going to be clobbered. They’re more dependent on Gulf oil than the Chinese

are. And then he added something that should alarm every European watching this. The Europeans are already in trouble because they’re not getting oil

and gas the way they used to from Russia. Now cut off the Middle East flow on top of that and you can see where the

European economies already struggling are going to be in even more trouble.

The United States set out to weaponize the straight of Hormuz against China.

What it actually did was conduct an act of friendly fire against every energy

dependent ally it needs for its Pacific strategy and every European economy it

claims to be defending. Daily charter rates for tankers carrying Middle Eastern crude to China have soared above $400,000.

Brent crude has surged past $92 a barrel with projections of 150 or higher if the straight remains closed.

And Venezuela, that first punch everyone celebrated, according to the South China Morning Post, Venezuelan oil is still

being sold to China. The only difference is that the United States is doing the selling now through offshore accounts.

The profits changed hands. the oil didn’t.

Meanwhile, China is accelerating negotiations for the power of Siberia 2 natural gas pipeline with Russia, using

Moscow as a safety valve to offset Middle Eastern volatility. The crisis is catalyzing exactly what Washington

feared most. A secure landbased Eurasian energy block between China and Russia

built at the direct expense of the vulnerable Gulf region America just destabilized.

The blockade strategy isn’t failing. It already failed. The question is how much damage America inflicts on itself and

its friends before someone in the room admits it. Now, let’s talk about the war itself. Because even if you set aside

the energy calculus, the military picture is sobering.

Operation Epic Fury launched on February 28th with nearly 900 coordinated air

strikes in just the first 12 hours. B-52 strat fortresses, stealth fighters, and

extensive naval assets. The first 24 to 36 hours cost an estimated 5.2 billion,

and a significant portion of that was spent striking decoys.

Let that sink in. Precisiong guided munitions, each costing hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars,

launched at targets that turned out to be elaborate fakes. The Iranians had prepared. They had moved, dispersed,

hidden, and planted dummy targets across the country. The United States fired first, verified second, and discovered

it had punched air. The battle of decoys. That’s what analysts are quietly calling it. The decapitation strikes

partially succeeded. The Supreme Leader was killed. But here’s the critical thing that the architects of this war

failed to understand. A point that Mirshimer has made with devastating clarity. The historical record is

unequivocal. There is no example in modern warfare of an air campaign alone producing regime change. Not in Korea

where we firebombed the North into rubble and they didn’t quit. Not in Vietnam where we bombed for years and

lost. Not even in Japan, where we firebombed Tokyo on a single night in March 1945, killing more people than at

either Hiroshima or Nagasaki, and then worked our way down a list of major cities. The Japanese didn’t surrender

until August. And most historians attribute that to the Soviet ground invasion of Manuria, not the atomic bombs. You want regime change in Iran,

you need boots on the ground. Iran is four times the size of Iraq with 93 million people. And even Donald Trump is

smart enough to know that sending an army into Iran would be a prescription for disaster. So we’re stuck with air

power alone. The one tool that history tells us without exception does not achieve what we’re asking it to achieve.

Meanwhile, the Iranians are fighting smart. A friend of mine in the defense industry described an Iranian drone recently. Sheet metal. cheap as hell,

but effective. These things cost thousands of dollars, maybe tens of thousands, and the US is firing

multi-million dollar interceptor missiles to shoot them down. That’s the exchange rate of this war. Iran has at

least $45,000 missiles remaining and perhaps 50,000 to 100,000 drones. The

United States started with an estimated 8 or 9,000 high-end munitions and has probably burned through at least half.

Replenishment takes months. Patriot missiles aren’t artillery rounds. You can’t surge production overnight. Even

General Kaine, Trump’s own handpicked chairman, the man who owes his fourth star to this president, reportedly made

clear before the war that this was not a viable military option. Every time he’s trotted out in front of cameras,

according to observers, he doesn’t look happy. He respected the Iranian ability to strategize. He understood what was

coming and he was overruled. The Iranians have destroyed over 27 US bases across the Gulf. They’ve taken out

virtually all long range early warning radars in Israel and across the Arabian Peninsula. The systems designed to give

early warning of incoming missile attacks. They’re systematically dismantling American military infrastructure using precision strikes

guided by China’s BEu satellite navigation system, which remained functional even after the United States jammed GPS across the entire theater.

The US Navy with two full carrier strike groups deployed still can’t escort commercial traffic through Hormuz. In

the 1980s, when America ran a similar convoy operation, it had a 600 ship navy. Today, eight Arley Burke class

destroyers and three latoral combat ships. That’s it. And here’s the feedback loop. Nobody in Washington has

reckoned with the rare earth minerals and gallium needed to build replacement missile systems, the semiconductors, the

precision components. China controls those supply chains. The country we’re trying to weaken controls the materials

we need to rebuild the weapons we’re burning through to weaken it. China’s 2026 military budget rose 7%

specifically designed to exploit this dynamic. Every American interceptor fired over the Persian Gulf is one fewer

available for a Taiwan contingency. And as time goes by, the depletion gets worse. It doesn’t flatline and it

certainly doesn’t increase, it decreases. The Iranians understand this math and so does Beijing. Five lessons

for Beijing and the one they didn’t publish. While America burns munitions and credibility, China is sitting in the world’s most consequential classroom.

The People’s Liberation Army publicly posted five lessons drawn from the Iran War publicly. That’s not an accident.

It’s a signal to Washington, to regional powers, and to Taiwan.

And what they didn’t publish is almost certainly more important than what they did. Lesson one, beware the enemy

within. The surgical elimination of Iran’s leadership was possible through deep human intelligence. Israeli agents

embedded inside the country, speaking the language, knowing the customs. They knew where the Supreme Leader was. They

knew the other leaders were meeting in daylight, assuming attacks would come only at night. China looked at that and

saw a mirror. Espionage prosecutions in Taiwan have surged from 16 cases in 2021

to 64 in 2024. Beijing is already running that playbook. But it also noted

the CIA released a recruiting video targeting disgruntled PLA officers, the ones caught up in Xiinping’s recent

anti-corruption purges. The paranoia this creates in an autocratic system can be weaponized or it can lead to purges that gut your military competence.

Either way, internal security is now as important as air defense. Lesson two,

diplomacy is a lie. Trump was negotiating with Iran. Reports indicated Iran had agreed to zero uranium

stockpiling and full verification days before the bombs fell. He did the same with Maduro. Talks one day, special

forces the next. Chinese state media published an editorial stating that diplomacy under Washington is not a

forum for sovereign equals, but an instrument of dominant power. A former Chinese military officer said, “Don’t

assume your adversaries will play by the rules. They may strike without warning,

ignoring both the rules of the game and the rules of war.” when she meets Trump at the end of this month, whatever warm

words are exchanged, this lesson will be sitting at the table between them.

Lesson three, superior firepower matters. Whatever the moral arguments,

hard power determines outcomes. She has been saying this for years. China’s defense budget rose 7%. nuclearpowered carriers, drones, refueling vessels,

electronic warfare systems, all accelerating toward 2027 readiness goals. And they noticed something else,

the devastating role Israel played in this war. Chinese analysts concluded that China must prevent Japan or the

Philippines from becoming what they call the Israel of East Asia, a regional ally capable of being used by Washington as a military staging platform. Lesson four,

the illusion of victory. You can destroy air defenses in the first hour and still not achieve your political objectives.

The regime isn’t gone. Netanyahu’s real goal, as Mirshimer argues, may not be regime change at all. It may be to

create a failed state, to fragment Iran the way Iraq was fragmented, the way Libya was turned into a failed state.

But even that requires sustained destruction that the United States cannot afford politically or financially.

Beijing wants Taiwan reunification,

not a rebellious occupation feeding decades of international condemnation. Iran is a cautionary tale. Lesson five,

self-reliance.

Don’t depend on supply chains your enemy can cut. Iran pursued self-sufficiency for decades. It wasn’t enough against

the full might of the US military. But China is not Iran. It has the industrial

base, the scale, the technology, and its BEu satellite system just proved its worth in live combat functioning when

American GPS jamming shut down everything else. That’s validation under fire. But here’s what the PLA didn’t

publish and what matters most. Operation Epic Fury is a proxy stress test for

Taiwan. Beijing is meticulously analyzing American stealth fighter performance, munition depletion rates,

signals, intelligence integration, and political resolve in real time. Every precision strike provides data on how

the US approaches the degradation of hardened military infrastructure. If the sanctions evasion architecture China spent years building, the shadow fleet,

the Chuchin conduit, the CIPS payment system can sustain commodity flows to a

state under total military embargo, then Beijing has validated the exact mechanisms needed to sustain the Chinese economy during a blockade over Taiwan.

Both Russia and China have enormous incentives to help Iran and ensure the United States suffers a humiliating

defeat. As Mirshimer noted, the US is a mortal enemy of both, something Putin and she understand perfectly, but are smart enough not to advertise publicly.

Seeing America pinned down and in serious trouble in Iran serves both their interests. Russia is providing

significant intelligence. China transferred air defense systems and long range anti-stalth radar before the war.

And as time passes, that assistance will only grow. China is building a bluewater navy. Its belt and road initiative

extends deep into the Middle East. The longer this war drags on, the more involved Beijing and Moscow become, and

the harder it gets for America and Israel to ever attack Iran again.

As one intelligence assessment concluded, the system China built was never really about Iran. It was about

Taiwan. The theoretical models are being graded in real time under combat conditions. Now, we arrive at the part

of this story that should genuinely terrify you. Because the most dangerous weapon in this war isn’t a hypersonic

missile or an armed drone. It’s a financial instrument most people have never heard of. The global derivatives

market carries a notional value estimated between 600 trillion and one quadrillion dollars. That is roughly 10

times the size of the entire global economy. And backing that entire edifice, approximately $300 billion in

actual collateral. For every dollar of real money in the system, there are roughly $2 to $3,000 in derivative bets riding on top of it.

A disproportionate share tied to energy prices. The Chicago Merkantile Exchange is reporting record-breaking volumes in energy contracts. People aren’t trading.

They’re panicking. They’re scrambling to cover positions designed for a world where oil costs $80 a barrel, not 150 or

200. The CME itself has flagged the extraordinary activity. And the question nobody at the Fed, the Bank of England,

or the ECB seems to be asking loudly enough is what happens when the counterparties can’t pay.

Iran knows exactly what happens. And this is the dimension western analysts keep missing. Iran has been operating

outside the swift banking system for decades. It built offshore companies in Dubai. It learned to navigate shadow

financial networks. And it learned to play the derivatives market itself,

placing bets on the very chaos it’s creating. When Iran attacks tankers in the straight of Hormuz, it’s not just

disrupting shipping, it’s moving energy prices. When it strikes fuel storage at Salala, it’s triggering insurance

recalculations, freight sir charges, and cascading repricing across every commodity market on the planet. When it targets Amazon data centers, and yes,

that’s happening. It’s hitting digital infrastructure that underpins western financial clearing systems. Iran’s

military command has announced the end of its policy of reciprocal strikes. From now on, continuous operations.

Their message, get ready for $200 oil.

Qatar’s leadership says we’re weeks away from an economic disaster. They’re warning of $150 oil. They’re invoking

force majour clauses to halt production because they’ve run out of storage. The UAE just shut down the world’s largest

refinery, not because of a bomb, but because there’s nowhere to put the output. 25% of the world’s oil is

currently offline. 35% of global fertilizer supply, which depends on Gulf

prochemical components, is disrupted. If oil breaks past $150,

the chain reaction begins. Knockout clauses in derivatives contracts start triggering. Banks that wrote those

contracts discover they can’t cover the exposure. It’s the insurance analogy.

Everyone crashes at once and the broker files for bankruptcy. Except the broker is the Western financial system. Gas at

$8 to$10 a gallon. Electricity costs surging, fertilizer scarcity driving

food prices into territory that topples governments, not in the developing world, but here. Mir Shimemer described

the spectrum plainly. You could have a worldwide depression. Or something less,

a global recession with huge consequences, especially for developing countries. The importance of oil for the

international economy simply cannot be underestimated. And the Trump administration understands this. He said

they can tell plausible stories about how this becomes one giant nightmare.

Now consider what China built while everyone was watching missiles. Beijing has engineered a parallel financial

architecture specifically designed to survive exactly this crisis. The crossber interbank payment system CIP is

processing 928 billion renmanb daily approximately 128 billion that’s not a

pilot program that’s a functioning alternative to swift project Mbridge a multi-entral bank digital currency

platform involving China Hong Kong Thailand the UAE and Saudi Arabia surged

past $55 billion in transaction volume by early 2026.

Because it uses a decentralized ledger for instant peer-to-peer settlements, a digital yuan transaction between an

Iranian entity and a Chinese importer is virtually impossible for the US Treasury to intercept, freeze, or even monitor.

Then there’s the Chuchin conduit, an opaque statebacked financial vehicle that channeled an estimated $ 8.4 4

billion dollar in 2024 alone through a closed loop oil for infrastructure barter system. Iranian crude goes to

Chinese buyers. The Chinese buyers deposit funds into Chu Shin. Chuchin pays Chinese engineering firms to build

airports, refineries, and railways inside Iran. No dollars cross a border.

No transaction touches the American financial system. Western surveillance is blind. Alongside this, a separate

barter network moves Iranian industrial metals, $6.1 billion dollar globally in

2023, including 1.6 6 billion in copper and 900 million in aluminum directly to

Chinese industrial centers in exchange for vehicles and automotive components from manufacturers like Cherry,

Dongfang, and JAC without traditional banking letters of credit. Provincial Chinese enterprises backed by municipal

governments operate entirely independently of Western regulatory frameworks. The global financial order

isn’t just being challenged, it’s being fragmented.

China promised Iran $400 billion over 25 years in their comprehensive strategic

partnership. The actual capital delivered minimal, deliberately so.

Beijing calculated that a structurally weakened, sanctions constricted Iran is a compliant partner. If they fully

capitalized the Iranian economy, Thrron might regain sovereignty to diversify its relationships. By keeping Iran on a

subsistence level lifeline, China guarantees permanent dependency.

90% of Iran’s crude exports go to a single buyer. That’s not a partnership.

That’s a monopoly wearing diplomatic clothing. The people who didn’t see the 2008 housing crisis coming are managing

this risk today. The derivatives market is roughly 10 times the size of the entire global economy and the needle

that could burst it is sitting in the straight of Hormuz. There’s one more dimension to this story that deserves attention because it determines what happens after the shooting stops.

The Gulf States were not consulted before February 28th. They weren’t part of the decision process and they’re

paying a horrific price. Their ports are under attack. Their oil infrastructure is being targeted. Their desalination

plants, and if you’ve worked in Saudi Arabia, you know that cities like Riad are almost completely dependent on

desalination are potential targets in an escalation spiral. neither side can fully control.

And what have the American security guarantees delivered? The bases that were supposed to protect these countries

have turned them into magnets for Iranian ballistic missiles and drones.

The interceptors that were supposed to shield the Gulf are reportedly being shipped to Israel instead. This betrayal is not abstract. Before February 28th,

the Gulf states were already hedging.

Saudi Arabia formed a strategic partnership with Pakistan and Pakistan explicitly stated it would extend its nuclear umbrella over Saudi Arabia.

Turkey is trying to join that arrangement making it triangular because the Turks are worried about the Americans too. Both Saudi Arabia and

Turkey have watched the tag team of Israel and the United States use military force with abandon in the region and they’ve asked the obvious

question. Who’s to say they won’t use it against us next? Israel attacked Qatar in the past year. That had a shocking

effect across the Gulf. The Americans didn’t protect Qatar from an Israeli strike. What does that tell you about the value of the American security

umbrella? China saw this opening years ago. In March 2023, Beijing brokered a

historic agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia to restore diplomatic relations after a 7-year freeze,

achieving what the United States could not. Chinese exports to the Middle East grew twice as fast as exports to the rest of the world in 2025.

Chinese direct investment in the region between 2019 and 2024 approached $89 billion.

Beijing is cultivating Egypt as a military partner, encouraging joint Arab defense structures under indirect

Chinese supervision and selling Gulf States sophisticated drones and air defense systems without the human rights

conditions that come attached to American weapons.

The post American Gulf era isn’t a prediction. It’s already underway. And Operation Epic Fury just accelerated it

by a decade. So where does this leave us? The United States is fighting a 21st century conflict with 20th century

assumptions. It assumed air power would produce regime change. The historical record says that has never happened

without ground forces. It assumed Iran would fracture. Instead, the population is rallying around the flag, as

populations under bombardment have done in every conflict from Korea to Vietnam to the London Blitz.

It assumed blocking the strait would China. It strengthened China’s hand and devastated American allies. It

assumed the financial system could absorb the shock, and the shock hasn’t even fully arrived yet. The Iranians are not looking for an off-ramp. They have

leverage and they know it. They want sanctions relief. They probably want reparations. And they want a guarantee that the tag team can’t pay them a

return visit in 6 months. In less than one year, Iran has been attacked twice.

They don’t want a third war. And the only way to prevent one is to negotiate from a position of strength, which is exactly where they believe they are.

Meanwhile, what has China accomplished?

It validated its sanctions evasion architecture under real combat conditions. CIP, Chu Shin, Mbridge, the

Shadow Fleet, all functioning under a full military and economic embargo. It collected realtime intelligence on American military capabilities,

depletion rates, and political fracture points. It watched the United States burn through irreplaceable munitions

dependent on Chinese controlled supply chains for replacement. It observed American allies in the Gulf lose faith

and begin building alternative security arrangements. And it accelerated the construction of a postdoll financial

architecture that renders traditional economic statecraft increasingly obsolete. Colonel Douglas McGregor

called it the last act in the American theatrical production in the Middle East. When this ends, we will be

finished in the Middle East. There will be no restoration of the status quo. We will simply get out and everybody in the

Middle East will want us out. Mir Shimemer went further. He called the United States a crusader state, addicted to war, trampling its own constitution,

undermining liberal values at home. If you live by the sword, he said, you turn yourself into a modern version of

Sparta. And the end result is not going to be happy. The old school is playing by the scenarios of the past. Venezuela,

Iraq, the belief that regime change can be delivered by air. The new school is playing a different game entirely.

energy diversification, industrial self-reliance, parallel financial systems, strategic patience, and the

cold calculation that your adversary will exhaust himself if you simply wait.

We are not watching a war. We are watching a rewriting of the rules of global power. And the cost of that

rewriting will be paid not by generals or strategists, but by ordinary people.

By the merchant mariner on a burning ship in the straight of Hormuz. By the family paying $10 a gallon at the pump.

By the retiree whose pension fund is one oil spike away from insolveny. By the young American who can’t afford

groceries because fertilizer costs tripled. So, I’ll leave you with one question,

not a rhetorical one, a real one. Are you ready for $10 gas and a global banking crisis for the sake of ambitions

in the desert? Think about that. And if this analysis gave you something the Evening News didn’t, subscribe because

the scenarios we track here are the ones that won’t be mentioned on television until it’s too late to prepare. If you

want to support us further, you can become a channel member.